Volume 13, Issue 1 (3-2025)                   JoMMID 2025, 13(1): 57-65 | Back to browse issues page

XML Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Wanswett W, Goenka S, Jain M, Loomba P, Sharma A, Tyagi S. Evaluating the Efficacy of Training and Education on Lowering Blood Culture Contamination Rates in a Tertiary Care Hospital. JoMMID 2025; 13 (1) :57-65
URL: http://jommid.pasteur.ac.ir/article-1-609-en.html
Evaluating the Efficacy of Training and Education on Lowering Blood Culture Contamination Rates in a Tertiary Care Hospital
Wanshisha Wanswett , Sheetal Goenka , Manisha Jain * , Poonam Loomba , Abha Sharma , Shivani Tyagi
Department of Microbiology, Govind Ballabh Pant Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research (GIPMER), New Delhi, India
Abstract:   (180 Views)
Introduction: Blood culture remains the gold standard for diagnosing bloodstream infections. Contamination during the collection, transport, or processing of blood culture samples can obscure the true pathogens with contaminant growth, thereby complicating or delaying the diagnosis of bacteremia. This study assesses the effectiveness of an educational intervention aimed at reducing blood culture contamination rates in a tertiary care hospital. Methods: This single-center study, aimed at quality improvement, included two phases: an observational phase from December 2022 to February 2023, and an interventional phase from March to May 2023. During the interventional phase, healthcare workers underwent comprehensive training in aseptic blood sample collection techniques. The study involved 980 patients, with 470 blood samples collected during the observational phase (December 2022–February 2023) and 510 during the interventional phase (March–May 2023), all processed using standard microbiological techniques. Blood cultures yielding commensal organisms without corresponding clinical symptoms were classified as contaminants. Results: The contamination rate of blood cultures dropped from 12.1% (57/470) during the observational phase to 8.6% (44/510) post-intervention; however, this reduction was not statistically significant (P = 0.34, chi-square test). Contamination rates during the observational phase were highest in the ward at 16.2%, followed by 13% in the outpatient department, and lowest in the intensive care unit at 7.1%. The predominant contaminants identified were Staphylococcus hominis, followed by Staphylococcus haemolyticus, highlighting common sources of contamination. Conclusion: Although the educational intervention did not yield a statistically significant decrease in blood culture contamination rates, the study underscores the need for multifaceted strategies, including enhanced training, environmental controls, and standardized protocols, to meet international benchmarks for contamination control.
 
Keywords: Blood culture contamination, Observational phase, Interventional phase, Quality improvement, Healthcare education
Full-Text [PDF 879 kb]   (12 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Original article | Subject: Infectious diseases and public health
Received: 2023/10/20 | Accepted: 2025/03/11 | Published: 2025/06/1
attachement [PDF 231 KB]  (6 Download)
References
1. Gunvanti R, Lakshmi JT, Ariyanachi K, Saranya M, Kamlakar S, Sakthivadivel V, et al. Blood culture contamination rate as a quality indicator - a prospective observational study. Maedica J Clin Med. 2022; 17 (2): 311-6.
2. Shaji R, Madigubba H, Priyadarshi K, Anandh P, Nathan B, Vivekanandan M, et al. Effectiveness of multimodal intervention to improve blood culture collection in the emergency department. J Glob Infect Dis. 2022; 14 (1): 10. [DOI:10.4103/jgid.jgid_138_21] [PMID] [PMCID]
3. Nachate S, Rouhi S, Ouassif H, Bennani H, Hachimi A, Mouaffak Y, et al. Multidrug-resistant bacteria isolated from blood culture samples in a moroccan tertiary hospital: true bacteremia or contamination? Infect Drug Resist. 2022; 15: 5691-704. [DOI:10.2147/IDR.S373065] [PMID] [PMCID]
4. Souvenir D, Anderson DE, Palpant S, Mroch H, Askin S, Anderson J, et al. Blood cultures positive for Coagulase-Negative Staphylococci: Antisepsis, pseudobacteremia, and therapy of patients. J Clin Microbiol. 1998; 36 (7): 1923-6. [DOI:10.1128/JCM.36.7.1923-1926.1998] [PMID] [PMCID]
5. Richter SS, Beekmann SE, Croco JL, Diekema DJ, Koontz FP, Pfaller MA, et al. Minimizing the workup of blood culture contaminants: Implementation and evaluation of a laboratory-based algorithm. J Clin Microbiol. 2002; 40 (7): 2437-44. [DOI:10.1128/JCM.40.7.2437-2444.2002] [PMID] [PMCID]
6. Archibald LK, Pallangyo K, Kazembe P, Reller LB. Blood culture contamination in Tanzania, Malawi, and the United States: A microbiological tale of three cities. J Clin Microbiol. 2006; 44 (12): 4425-9. [DOI:10.1128/JCM.01215-06] [PMID] [PMCID]
7. Tenderenda A, Łysakowska M, Dargiewicz R, Gawron-Skarbek A. Blood culture contamination: A single general hospital experience of 2-year retrospective study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022; 19 (5): 3009. [DOI:10.3390/ijerph19053009] [PMID] [PMCID]
8. Aiesh BM, Daraghmeh D, Abu-Shamleh N, Joudallah A, Sabateen A, Al Ramahi R. Blood culture contamination in a tertiary care hospital: a retrospective three-year study. BMC Infect Dis. 2023; 23 (1): 448. [DOI:10.1186/s12879-023-08428-0] [PMID] [PMCID]
9. Berksoy E, Karadağ Öncel E, Bardak Ş, Demir Ş, Bozkaya Yılmaz S, Demir G, et al. True Bacteremia or Contamination? Predictive factors for contamination in blood cultures obtained in the pediatric emergency room. Eurasian J Emerg Med. 2023; 22 (1): 7-13. [DOI:10.4274/eajem.galenos.2022.90582]
10. Laque-Ale A, Hueda-Zavaleta M, Gómez de la Torre JC, Alvarado L, Cáceres del Águila JA. Diagnostic utility of blood culture positivity times to distinguish true bacteremia from contaminants based on an automated system. Rev Peru Med Exp Salud Publica. 2023; 40 (4): 451-8. [DOI:10.17843/rpmesp.2023.404.12724] [PMID] [PMCID]
11. Chandrasekar PH, Brown WJ. Clinical issues of blood cultures. Arch Intern Med. 1994; 154 (8): 841-9. [DOI:10.1001/archinte.1994.00420080023003]
12. Sacchetti B, Travis J, Steed LL, Webb G. Identification of the main contributors to blood culture contamination at a tertiary care academic medical centre. Infect Prev Pract. 2022; 4 (3): 100219. [DOI:10.1016/j.infpip.2022.100219] [PMID] [PMCID]
13. Wilson ML. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Principles and procedures for blood cultures: approved guideline. Wayne, Pa.: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; 2007.
14. Mokhtar NA, Ting SY, Abidin NZ, Hameed AA, Mohamed Z, Mustapa NI, et al. The rate of blood culture contamination and common organisms isolated in Malaysian public hospitals. Malays J Pathol. 2024; 46 (2): 307-14.
15. Palavecino EL, Campodónico VL, She RC. Laboratory approaches to determining blood culture contamination rates: an ASM laboratory practices subcommittee report. J Clin Microbiol. 2024; 62 (2): e0102823. [DOI:10.1128/jcm.01028-23] [PMID] [PMCID]
16. Fabre V, Carroll KC, Cosgrove SE. Blood culture utilization in the hospital setting: A call for diagnostic stewardship. J Clin Microbiol. 2022; 60 (3): e0100521. [DOI:10.1128/jcm.01005-21] [PMID] [PMCID]
17. Hall KK, Lyman JA. Updated review of blood culture contamination. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2006; 19 (4): 788-802. [DOI:10.1128/CMR.00062-05] [PMID] [PMCID]
18. Mullane N, O'Mara N, Coffey D, Connolly A, O'Callaghan I, Kelly D, et al. Reducing Blood Culture Contamination Rates: Introduction of a Combined Education and Skin Antisepsis Intervention. Access Microbiol. 2024; 6 (7): 000806.v3. [DOI:10.1099/acmi.0.000806.v3] [PMID] [PMCID]
19. Yamamoto K, Mezaki K, Ohmagari N. Simple indictor of increased blood culture contamination rate by detection of coagulase-negative staphylococci. Sci Rep. 2021; 11 (1): 17538. [DOI:10.1038/s41598-021-96997-y] [PMID] [PMCID]
20. Berends MS, Luz CF, Ott A, Andriesse GI, Becker K, Glasner C, et al. Trends in occurrence and phenotypic resistance of Coagulase-Negative Staphylococci (CoNS) found in human blood in the Northern Netherlands between 2013 and 2019. Microorganisms. 2022; 10 (9): 1801. [DOI:10.3390/microorganisms10091801] [PMID] [PMCID]
21. Chukwuemeka I, Samuel Y. Quality assurance in blood culture: A retrospective study of blood culture contamination rate in a tertiary hospital in Nigeria. Niger J Clin Med. 2014; 55 (3): 201-3. [DOI:10.4103/0300-1652.132038] [PMID] [PMCID]
22. Bekeris LG, Tworek JA, Walsh MK, Valenstein PN. Trends in blood culture contamination: A college of American pathologists Q-tracks study of 356 institutions. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2005; 129 (10): 1222-5. [DOI:10.5858/2005-129-1222-TIBCCA] [PMID]
23. Hall RT, Domenico HJ, Self WH, Hain PD. Reducing the blood culture contamination rate in a Pediatric Emergency Department and subsequent cost savings. J Pediatr. 2013; 131 (1): e292-7. [DOI:10.1542/peds.2012-1030] [PMID]
24. Krapp F, Rondon C, Amaro C, Barco-Yaipén E, Valera-Krumdieck M, Vásquez R, et al. Underutilization and quality gaps in blood culture processing in public hospitals of Peru. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2022; 106 (2): 432-40. [DOI:10.4269/ajtmh.21-0770] [PMID] [PMCID]
25. Ohta R, Sano C. Factors associated with blood culture contamination in rural hospitals in Japan: A Cross-Sectional Study. Cureus. 2023; 15 (10): e47987. [DOI:10.7759/cureus.47987]
Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA
Send email to the article author

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.